INSIGHTS
The Squawk
For the people making the AI decisions, not the ones building it.
-
The first rung is bending: Stanford’s update on AI and entry-level jobs
Stanford’s updated payroll study puts employment of 22- to 25-year-olds in AI-exposed jobs 19 percent below their peers. The gap is in hiring, not layoffs.
-
Faster code, same barriers: AI and the accessibility gap
Two accessibility vendors say AI is widening the gap: AI search lands people on weaker pages, and AI-written code ships with barriers. What holds up, and what to do.
-
Governance on paper: What a survey of 500 leaders found about AI oversight
87 percent of large organizations in an American Arbitration Association survey have AI governance. 22 percent say it works. The gap is in escalation and evidence.
-
Access, not restriction: AI policy for students with disabilities
An updated paper from EALA and New America puts students with disabilities at the start of AI policy. Most of what it asks of districts happens at the purchase.
BROWSE THE SQUAWK
Follow the issues that matter.
The Squawk covers nine editorial beats across governance, procurement, deployment, workforce, education, accessibility, and more.
ABOUT THE SQUAWK
Reporting on what happens after the AI demo.
The Squawk looks at the real-world decisions, challenges, and consequences of AI adoption. We cover governance, procurement, deployments, audits, failures, workforce impact, education, accessibility, and the policies shaping what comes next.
Our goal is to give leaders the context they need to make better AI decisions, with a clear view of what is working, what is not, and what to watch for.